Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On August 21, 2017, from around 18:10 to around 18:15 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) was not a national bank located in Daegu-dong-gu 153 (Monro-dong), Daegu-gu dong-gu 153 (Monro-dong 153); (b) caused the Defendant to theft by using approximately KRW 600,000,000 cash left by the victim C within the automation point of the same 365 (Monro-dong 153).

Summary of Evidence

1. The legal statement of the witness C;

1. Video recorded in CDs (on-site CCTV images);

1. CCTV photographs, photographs, or personal financial transactions;

1. Each internal investigation report and investigation report (Evidence Nos. 3, 4, 6, 7, and 10 in the list of evidence) / [the defendant brought a victim's hand room to find the master person, and there was no cash or identification card within this period;

The argument is asserted.

① However, the Defendant found the victim’s grandchildren, opened a room to confirm identification card or contact number, without immediately reporting it to the police station, etc., or brought the victim’s fingers into the Defendant’s bags without reporting it to the police station, etc. ② According to the police interrogation protocol against the Defendant, the Defendant can be recognized that at least a card and receipt was made within the victim’s fingers. The Defendant’s crime place is where CCTV was taken for 24 hours, so it can be sufficiently confirmed the victim’s identity on this basis, even though he was able to sufficiently verify the victim’s identity. ③ Although the victim’s statement was able to reverse the police’s statement at this court, the Defendant appears to have been true in consideration of the specific circumstances before and after the Defendant’s statement. ④ In light of the victim’s behavior at the under influence of alcohol, in full view of the fact that the victim’s statement was made in order for the Defendant to reach an excessive agreement, the victim’s intent and intent of unlawful acquisition can be sufficiently acknowledged.

Therefore, the defendant's status.