logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.01.29 2014가단22990
건물명도 등
Text

1. The Defendant shall order the Plaintiff to order the building indicated in the attached list.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

3...

Reasons

The following facts may be acknowledged according to the purport of the whole pleadings and Gap 1 through 3, 5, and all pleadings.

On August 1, 2010, the Plaintiff and the Defendant concluded a lease contract (hereinafter referred to as the “instant lease contract”) with respect to the real estate on which the Defendant leased and entered in the separate sheet (hereinafter referred to as “the instant real estate”) on the lease deposit, KRW 8 million, KRW 1,400,000 per month of rent, and the period of two years.

Even after the expiration of the contract period, the defendant continues to occupy and use the real estate of this case.

The defendant did not pay two or more cars.

Therefore, the instant lease agreement was legally terminated as a delivery of a copy of the complaint stating the Plaintiff’s declaration of intent seeking termination on the grounds of the Defendant’s default, and thus, the Defendant is obligated to issue an order to the Plaintiff to order the instant real estate.

The plaintiff's claim shall be accepted with due reason.

arrow