The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., 30 years of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case in this court is recognized to have committed the crimes of this case, and the defendant appears to have an attitude contrary to this court, and there is no reason to believe that the defendant murdered the victims due to any intention other than the malicious sentiment against the victims. The defendant has no history of criminal punishment in the Republic of Korea, and the defendant, after committing each of the crimes of this case, had a convenience store employee report to the police and arrested the police assigned to the police.

On the other hand, each of the crimes of this case was committed by the defendant while in his custody at the time of murdering the victim's head, etc. who is a workplace volunteer, in light of the cruel criminal method and the circumstances of the crime. In the case of the victim E, the victim Eul did not have any specific scambling to the victim's body and inflicted bodily injury only to the two parts and the scambs. However, in the case of the victim D, the victim was killed on several parts, such as hand, hand, scam, face, etc., and the defendant was killed at the time of the above victim's scambling, in light of the circumstances where DNA of the above victim's scambling, it appears that the defendant first killed the victim's scam and murdered the victim's resistance to the defendant, and each of the crimes of this case is absolutely protected, and even if the victim scambling the defendant without any reason, it can be justified for the defendant's desire to kill the defendant's immediately before the crime of this case.