logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2014.11.27 2014구합2584
강의전담전환교원대상결정 취소결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a school foundation that establishes and operates the two Korea Institute of Arts (hereinafter “instant university”).

B. A was appointed as the instant university C and a full-time lecturer on March 1, 1997, and the affiliation to D was changed on March 1, 1999. On April 1, 199, it was promoted to the assistant professor and the associate professor on April 1, 2005. On August 1, 2010, it was changed to the departments belonging to E and was reappointed for six years on March 1, 201.

C. On July 12, 2011, A had sufficiently informed the Defendant of the provisions on the restructuring of the university of this case and the provisions on teaching staff in exclusive charge of lecture (hereinafter “instant provisions”) and submitted a written consent to the enforcement thereof (Evidence A5).

On April 22, 2013, the president of the University of this case selected E as the department subject to restructuring in the year of 2013.

On June 12, 2013, the above University Restructuring Committee decided E and five teachers whose evaluation results are less than 70 points and who are the lowest A as teachers subject to restructuring.

E. On June 18, 2013, the Plaintiff notified A that he/she was determined as a teacher subject to restructuring and requested A to present his/her opinion on the mobile desired subject.

F. A submitted an application to wish to be F with F on June 20, 2013, but both F and 3 teachers agreed to move A to F with F.

Accordingly, on June 24, 2013, the Plaintiff decided A as a person with exclusive charge of lectures, and decided A as a person with the same content as the following (Evidence A No. 2; hereinafter “the instant notification”) 1. Matters relating to Articles 6, 8(1) and (5) and 9 of the Regulations on Restructuring.

2. As a result of the receipt of the relevant department’s opinions with respect to the department wishing to move the post-issuance of the thickness of ear professors, it shall be known that they were not consented.

3. Accordingly, the professor notifies on September 1, 2013 that he/she is eligible for a faculty member exclusively responsible for lectures as of September 1, 2013. By June 28, 2013, he/she provides a certificate of his/her intention to convert his/her exclusively responsible for lectures and a certificate of his/her intention to retire.

arrow