1. The Defendant’s KRW 5,00,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of 5% from October 21, 2016 to December 13, 2019.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. 1) On October 21, 2016, C: D vehicles around 17:55 on October 21, 2016 (hereinafter “Defendant vehicles”).

) A driver of Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter referred to as the “instant accident”) led the Plaintiff to suffer injuries, such as salt pans, tensions, etc., on the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle, while driving into a pressure-driven pansle room on the north wall of Seongdong-gu Sungdong Island, and driving into the front part of the Plaintiff’s vehicle (hereinafter referred to as the “instant accident”).

(2) The Defendant is an insurer who has concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the Defendant’s vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence No. 2-1, Eul evidence No. 1, the purport of whole pleadings

B. According to the above facts, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for the damages caused by the accident in this case as an insurer of defendant vehicle.

2. In addition to the matters stated below within the scope of liability for damages, each corresponding item of the Schedule of Calculation of Compensation for Damages shall be as follows, and in principle, the period for the convenience of calculation shall be calculated on a monthly basis, but less than the last month and less than KRW 1 shall be discarded.

The calculation of the current value at the time of the accident shall be based on the discount method that deducts the interim interest calculated at the rate of 5/12 per month.

In addition, it is rejected that the parties' arguments are not stated separately.

The plaintiff's personal information No. 1) The latter disability and labor ability loss rate: The plaintiff lost 7% labor ability reflecting 50% of the Mabrodrid damage in spine No. 3-A in the remaining condition of the upper right radioactive ray, the right side ray damage 3-A, and even if not, the plaintiff lost 4% labor ability by G organization, and the defendant did not recognize the plaintiff's labor ability.

Domins, Domins, .