A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Definite, around March 15, 2017, the Defendant: (a) reported by the United Nations on the street near the bus stops located in 107-ro 107, Yacheon-ro, Yacheon-ro, Yacheon-ro, Yacheon-gu, Yacheon-gu, the Defendant: (b) was a victim who was dispatched after receiving a 112 report to the effect that he was fluoring a taxi engineer under the influence of alcohol in the vicinity of the bus stops in front of the apartment; (c) “Chewing fluor”, “a bit of a bitch bitch; and (d) whether the fluor of a fluor bit

In the context of “Cyp chronia”, “Cyp chronia” and “Cypar”, the victim was openly insultingd.

2. The Defendant interfering with the performance of official duties shall not take a bath at the above time and place.

The victim assaulted the victim, such as pusheding the chest, breaking, breaking, and breaking the breast by booming the victim, thereby hindering the police officer's legitimate execution of duties concerning the on-site measures under the 112 Report.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of laws and regulations on police statements made to C and D;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act, Articles 136 (1) and 311 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act are the sentencing factors favorable to the Defendant, such as the fact that the Defendant recognized the instant crime and appears to have been repented, and that the Defendant appears to have made efforts to treat alcohol.

On the other hand, the crime of this case is committed against a police officer in the course of performing official duties by insulting the defendant, and obstructing the performance of official duties by assaulting a police officer who has prevented him/her, and it is not easy to do so. There are many violent criminal records such as having been sentenced to a fine of KRW 7 million due to interference with the performance of official duties in September 2014, and it appears that the defendant did not receive a letter from the damaged police officer.