The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The lower court’s sentence (the imprisonment of eight months, the suspension of execution of two years, the community service order 80 hours, the order to attend a law enforcement lecture) is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. The fact that the judgment defendant has been punished for the same kind of crime, and that the nature of each of the crimes of this case is not good, is disadvantageous to the defendant.

On the other hand, considering the circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the defendant's violation of the crime, the agreement with the victims, and the fact that there was no record of punishment exceeding the fine, and the sentencing conditions indicated in the records, such as the defendant's age, occupation, sex, environment, and circumstances after the crime, it is difficult to view that the court below's punishment is too uneas

Therefore, the prosecutor's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.