1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 7, 1992, the Plaintiff was appointed as a police officer on December 1, 2013, and was promoted to the police officer on December 1, 2013, and served as a team member from May 2, 2016 to Ulsan Metropolitan City Police Agency B and C District.

B. The Defendant, upon resolution by the General Disciplinary Committee on Police Officers of the Ulsan District Police Station, issued a reduction of salary two months against the Plaintiff on June 30, 2016 (hereinafter “instant disposition”), on the ground that the Plaintiff committed the following misconduct (hereinafter “instant misconduct”) and committed the misconduct under Article 56 (Duty of Fidelity), 57 (Duty of Good Faith), and 63 (Duty of Maintenance of Dignity) of the State Public Officials Act, thereby falling under Article 78 (1) 1, 2, and 3 of the State Public Officials Act.

Police officers shall observe all Acts and subordinate statutes, perform their duties faithfully, comply with orders in the course of performing their duties, and shall not commit any act detrimental to their dignity and dignity.

1. On March 29, 2016, a person subject to a violation of instructions and orders (undertake-down) has been continuously receiving culture and instructions from the chief of a police station, etc., and was aware of the fact that he/she is subject to criminal punishment and disciplinary action when driving under the influence of alcohol. On March 29, 2016, a person subject to a violation of instructions and orders was aware of the fact that he/she was under the influence of alcohol. On March 29, 2016, a person driving a DNA vehicle with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.031% under the influence of alcohol and driving a vehicle with approximately 2 km distance from

By causing a physical damage resulting from the above stopping of Frocketing vehicles, the driver violated the direction and order prohibiting driving under the influence of alcohol by causing a traffic accident.

2. On April 4, 2016, a person subject to injury to dignity (definite address) was subject to ex officio warning by the chief of the police station as a drunk driving under the numerical value as stated in 1.1.

Nevertheless, on June 9, 2016, the subject is without being able to do so.