1. The plaintiff's respective claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is the lessee of the third floor among the buildings listed in the attached list (hereinafter “instant building”); Defendant B is the owner and lessor of the instant building; Defendant C is the owner and lessor of the instant building; and Defendant C is the owner of the instant automobile D truck (hereinafter “instant automobile”).

B. On May 29, 2015, around 21:10, a fire was caused by a fire on the first floor parking lot of the instant building due to a fire, and the 5th cost of the parking lot was minor, and the building exterior walls, etc. were damaged.

(hereinafter “instant fire”). C.

The Plaintiff, due to the instant fire, sustained injuries, such as spin pressure drums (one summary) in the process of cryping fire fighters into the upper floor of the third floor, and eight of other residents received emergency treatment by inhaleing smoke, and one person suffered cryp pictures, etc.

In light of the fact that the first reporter reported that the vehicle loaded on the first floor of the building of this case, which was installed in the instant parking lot, and the early witness also stated that he observed the instant automobile loaded on the instant vehicle to the tent, it was presumed that the vicinity of the vehicle loaded on the instant vehicle was the first place of combustion, and that the fire caused the combustion of combustible substances, such as strings, stroths, plastics, and the instant building, which were loaded on the loaded, was the cause of spreading the fire. 2) The reason for fire was determined: ① Although the CCTV system of the parking lot was destroyed, it cannot be determined whether the external person enters the parking lot and the fire prevention is possible, it cannot be ruled out that the first reporter’s statement and the student at the time of arrival, and that the first witness was not at the scene, and that there was no possibility of fire prevention, and that there was a large number of residents or residents of the first cigarette at the vicinity of the instant parking unit after the arrival of the first cigarette.