Text
1. The Defendant is based on the transfer from the Plaintiff on August 7, 2017 of the motor vehicle indicated in the separate sheet.
Reasons
1. The facts of recognition are as follows: (a) the Plaintiff received a vehicle security loan on or around July 2015, and delivered documents necessary for the registration of the transfer of ownership, such as a letter of consent to voluntary disposal of automobiles listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant automobiles”) to the credit service provider; and (b) delivered the instant automobiles to the Plaintiff; and (c) the Defendant, who received the instant automobiles from a person who was not registered, transferred the instant automobiles to Hyundai Marine Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. and the instant automobiles from August 7, 2017 to August 7, 2018, can be recognized as having concluded the automobile insurance contract with the Plaintiff, either there is no dispute between the parties, or in full view of the purport of the entire arguments stated in the evidence No. 1
2. The allegations and judgment of the parties
A. The transferee of a registered motor vehicle shall file an application with the Mayor/Do governor for the registration of transfer of the ownership of the motor vehicle, and if the transferee of the motor vehicle fails to file an application for the registration of transfer, the owner recorded in the register may file an application for the registration of transfer on behalf of the transferee (Article 12(1) and (4) of the Motor Vehicle Management Act). The owner of the motor vehicle register can seek the registration of transfer of ownership as well as the transferee of the motor vehicle from himself/herself, and as seen earlier, the defendant who received the motor vehicle from the transferee of the motor vehicle from the owner of the motor vehicle register of this case is obliged
B. As to this, the Defendant established a right to collateral security as of June 5, 2015, and imposed taxes in arrears and fines for negligence, etc. on the instant automobile. However, the Defendant did not intend to accept it. Thus, prior to the Defendant’s procedure for cancelling the registration of creation of collateral security and paying taxes, etc., the Plaintiff did so.