1. The Defendant is limited to the Plaintiff’s sale on January 16, 2013 with respect to the real estate indicated in the attached list.

1. The fact that on January 16, 2013, the buyer entered into a sales contract with the Plaintiff and the seller as the Defendant (hereinafter “instant sales contract”) with respect to each of the real estate listed in the attached list of judgment on the cause of the claim (hereinafter “the instant real estate”), can be acknowledged according to the evidence No. 2, barring any special circumstance, the Defendant, the seller, is liable to implement the procedure for the registration of transfer of ownership based on the instant sales contract to the Plaintiff, the buyer, barring any special circumstance.

2. Judgment on the defendant's assertion

A. The Defendant’s assertion as follows concerning the developments leading up to the conclusion of the instant sales contract. The Defendant asserted that the Plaintiff’s claim in this case was as follows: (a) and (b) as to the Plaintiff’s claim; (c) around 1992, the name of C was stated in C’s preparatory document of the original Defendant; and (d) “E” appears to have been named as “E”; (b) the Defendant entered into a title trust agreement with the Defendant, and purchased and registered from the former owner under the name of C. The Plaintiff agreed to pay KRW 40 million to C, and the instant real estate was owned by the Plaintiff on a conclusive basis. The Defendant merely stated that C may grant KRW 300 to the Plaintiff at least 30,000 upon entering into the instant sales contract. However, C concluded a title trust agreement with the Plaintiff, concluded a sales contract with the Defendant, and prepared a sales contract with the Defendant to use D’s land for the purpose of D’s purchase and sale contract, and the Plaintiff did not transfer the instant real estate to C’s purchaser.