The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the lower court (two years of imprisonment, confiscation) on the summary of the reasons for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the Defendant recognized and reflected each of the instant crimes, and that the amount of benefits arising from each of the instant crimes was not so large.

However, in full view of the following circumstances: (a) the frequency of habitual night structure theft crimes exceeds seven times; (b) the Defendant had a large number of identical criminal records; (c) the Defendant committed another crime without being aware of the fact that the Defendant had committed a repeated crime at the time of committing the instant crime; (d) the injury was most not recovered; and (e) the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime; and (e) the circumstances after committing the instant crime, etc., the lower court’s sentencing judgment exceeded the reasonable bounds of its discretion.

There are no circumstances such as evaluation or maintenance of it is deemed unfair.

Therefore, since the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.