The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. As to the guilty portion of the judgment of the court below on the gist of the grounds of appeal, in light of all the sentencing conditions, the sentence of the court below (two years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant is divided into and against the wrong facts, and the fact that the defendant does not want the punishment of the defendant at the original trial by agreement with the victims is reasonable.

However, the crime of this case is committed by threatening or imprisoning female victims using a beer knife knife knife knife knife and knife knife, which is dangerous for the defendant to commit the crime of this case. The method of crime is very dangerous, and the nature of the crime is not high, even if the defendant was placed in the place of suspended sentence due to the same kind of crime against female, it is highly likely to be subject to criticism without any reflect that it was committed during the suspended sentence period. When the defendant is sentenced to a sentence, the court below seems to have determined the sentence by fully considering the fact that the suspended sentence is invalidated, and considering all other conditions of sentencing such as the defendant's age, character, conduct, environment, etc., the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.