A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a car B in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (or the injury) and the Road Traffic Act (or the injury).

On April 18, 2018, the Defendant driven the said car without obtaining a driver's license of the said car on April 23:45, 2018, and driven the road between the four-lanes per minute in the direction of the police station in the direction of the sub-section, in order to drive the said car at an indefinite speed.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the steering side and the steering system of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and did not properly go on the front side without the driver’s license and did not proceed as it is, and instead, went to the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle after the Defendant’s vehicle was driven by the victim C (25 tax) waiting in the front side of the passenger vehicle, and thereby, the Defendant got to take part of the back part of the FF franchise passenger vehicle, which was driven by the victim E (52 e.g., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the driver’s vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by the above occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim C, such as salt dye, etc. requiring approximately two weeks of treatment, and suffered injury to the victim E, such as salt dye, tensions, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of treatment. At the same time, the Defendant destroyed the victim C’s fye-dyd vehicle for repair, such as the exchange of electricity and gye-fyer, and escaped from the site without withdrawing necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victims, even though the Defendant destroyed the fye-owned vehicle of the victim E for repair cost of KRW 1,790,138 of repair cost, such as the exchange of gye-fyer, etc., even though he did not immediately stop the vehicle and immediately withdraw necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victims.

2...