logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2014.11.14 2014고단34 (1)
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 12, 2013, the Defendant: (a) established 40 game instruments in the game room in the name of “E Gameland” with three stories (area of approximately 210.72 square meters) in the building D on May 12, 2013; (b) provided customers with game products different from the contents rated from around that time to June 13, 2013; and (c) knowingly aware of the fact that customers would exchange the items cards acquired by them in cash, thereby aiding and abetting the act of offering them to exchange and exchange the said items with drinking water, etc. from May 12, 2013 to June 13, 2013.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each prosecutor's interrogation protocol concerning B and C;

1. Each police interrogation protocol concerning F and G;

1. A statement of H (investigative records, one right 136 pages);

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure (investigative records, 30 pages, 31 pages);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (to hear and report a suspect's F phone statement), investigation report (to attach a result letter);

1. Subparagraph 4 of Article 45 and Article 32 (1) 2 of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry related to criminal facts, Article 32 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point where a game product is provided in a manner different from the contents of classification), Article 44 (1) 2 and Article 32 (1) 7 of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry, and Article 32 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point where a game product exchange aid is provided in a manner different from those of classification);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor (it shall be considered that there are two times the same kind of fine, fine and electric power, and that the person refuses to attend due to escape);

1. Articles 32(2) and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for aiding and abetting and mitigation;

arrow