The defendant's business suspension disposition against the plaintiff on June 25, 2020 shall be revoked for three months.

The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the defendant.

Details of the disposition

The Plaintiff’s “B dental clinic” (hereinafter “instant dental clinic”) from November 18, 2014 to Kimhae-si.

D is a dentist who is operating the dental department of this case, and C is a person who was, and was, a doctor of the dental department of this case, and D is a person who was, and was, a dentist of the dental department of this case, and E is a patient who had received treatment by completing the dental department of this case

E, upon completing the instant dental license on June 17, 2019, she received medical treatment from the Plaintiff as to pains, 36, and 37, on the left side of the instant dental license. At the time C provided medical treatment to the Plaintiff. On June 19, 2019, E provided an explanation as to the Plaintiff’s treatment plan by visiting the instant dental license again on the part of the Plaintiff.

E received treatment from the Plaintiff on June 23, 2019, 36, such as dental surgery. After 37, the Plaintiff’s crypology was found to have been deleted, while the Plaintiff’s crypology was found to have been discovered to have been 36 as the crypology on the part of the Plaintiff’s crypology, and the Defendant filed a civil petition on this point.

Accordingly, on July 24, 2019 and August 1, 2019, the public official in charge of the Defendant’s public official conducted a business trip on the instant dental services and confirmed the fact that C and D, other than the Plaintiff, additionally prepared and deleted the contents of the medical records.

On May 8, 2020, the Defendant requested the Plaintiff to provide a prior notice and opinion on the fact that the Plaintiff was the cause of the disposition, stating that “In the Plaintiff’s visit to the instant dental surgery from June 17, 2019 to June 23, 2019, C and D had the Plaintiff prepare a record of medical treatment to be prepared on the basis of medical judgment, and through such medical practice, the Plaintiff would cause physical damage to E”. On June 25, 2020, the Plaintiff provided that the Plaintiff provided the Plaintiff with a prior notice of disposition and opinion, in violation of Articles 27(1) and 27(5) of the Medical Service Act, and provided that the medical personnel or a medical institution’s employee provided a medical practice to an unqualified person or provided a medical practitioner with a medical practice other than the licensed practice.