logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2017.02.15 2016고단3328
공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 21, 2016, around 02:35, at the defendant's house located D 102, the defendant assaulted the male line of E living together and his nameless non-merchants, and the defendant's sound wnd at the defendant's home, reported to 112, and reported to 112, H and Ha were called to the defendant's house.

At that place, the police officers discovered that the Defendant was faced with the Defendant’s wife on the head side of the aftermath of the Defendant’s non-merchant’s male side, and that the Defendant attempted to verify the circumstances of the instant case against the Defendant, and the Defendant her expressed a desire to the above police officers, and her her her son flick G’s body, pushed the Defendant’s body with his her hand, and her her flick G’s left side by drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases and the maintenance of public order by police officers.

[The defendant and his defense counsel denied the behavior or intent of obstructing the performance of official duties of this case, and therefore, it is recognized by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, i.e., the situation at the time of the dispatch (the situation where the house is in distress and two persons other than the defendant are seen to have suffered bodily injury) of the defendant's response (the conversation between the defendant and the living room after the first confirmation of the defendant), the defendant's speech and behavior (the conversation between the person who appears to be the victim after the first confirmation of the defendant and the living room), etc. are specific and consistent, so credibility can be recognized. ② The He's statement at the site of the defendant's response is specific and consistent, and consistent, consistent with the above G's statement at the request of G, and it can be sufficiently recognized, and therefore, the defendant and his defense counsel's assertion is without merit).

arrow