1. The defendant-appellant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the defendant.

purport.

1. The grounds for appeal by the defendant-appellant of the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and decision of the court of first instance are justified even if each evidence submitted to the court of first instance was presented to this court.

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, except for the parts concerning the appropriate repair cost of the Defendant’s vehicle in this case as follows: (a) The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, and thus, it is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Therefore, it is accepted by the main sentence of Article 420

2. The plaintiff asserts that the appropriate repair cost of the defendant's vehicle in this case is 14,167,880 won based on the result of the first instance court's appraisal of repair cost. Thus, the plaintiff asserts that the damages liability of the plaintiff's defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant's damages in this case cannot exceed 14,167,880 won. Accordingly, the defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant's damages in this case's repair cost is calculated as 29,876,581 won (10,90,000 won for vehicle repair cost) based on the repair cost appraisal of the defendant's vehicle in this case. Thus, the plaintiff's damages liability of the defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant's damages in this case is considered to be the whole amount of the above repair cost.