Defendant

All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

1. The defendant asserts that the decision of the court below on the summary of the reasons for appeal (one hundred months of imprisonment, confiscation, and collection) is too unreasonable, and the prosecutor is too unfasible and unfair.

2. The judgment is based on the facts that the defendant committed the crime of this case in spite of the fact that he had been punished three times for the same kind of crime, and that the business period and the size of the crime of this case are considerable disadvantageous grounds for sentencing, and that the defendant is against the confession of the crime, and that the defendant has no criminal record exceeding the suspended sentence is a favorable reason for sentencing.

In full view of the above sentencing factors, in light of the Defendant’s age, family relation, economic situation, background and motive leading to committing the crime, and all other matters pertaining to the sentencing indicated in the records and arguments in this case, the judgment of the court below is deemed appropriate, and the Defendant and the Prosecutor’s assertion are without merit.

3. In conclusion, since the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.