logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.07.25 2017고단5259
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of a sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2017 Highest 5259"

1. Around 21:00 on October 13, 2017, the Defendant: (a) was under the influence of alcohol at the E convenience point in the management of the victim D (the remaining 58 years of age) located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and was unable to bring a disturbance for about 10 minutes on the ground that the victim did not receive his/her personal information; (b) the Defendant was able to avoid a disturbance for about 10 minutes by following the victim; (c) even though the police officers dispatched after receiving a report after the report were to return home, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s duty of management of convenience points by force, such as taking the victim’s bath and booming the fat for 10 minutes of the victim’s fat; and (d) the Defendant obstructed the victim’s duty of management of convenience points.

2. On October 13, 2017, at the E convenience store as indicated in paragraph (1) around 22:00, the Defendant assaulted the victim by taking a bath against the victim D (the victim South and 58 years old) for the said reasons, such as cutting down the victim’s neck by hand and cutting down the breath of the victim’s blap with his hand, and booming the victim’s breath with his hand at one time.

The Defendant, around November 26, 2017, 2017, 6352, recommended that the police box G, who belongs to the Seoul Gangseo-gu Police Station F box dispatched after receiving a report from an abnormal person on the front side of the 127 Geum-gu, Gangseo-gu, Seoul, Seoul, to verify the details of the report and to return home, on November 26, 2017, the Defendant “YYYYYYY 6352,” and recommended that G be able to verify the details of the report and return home.

Whether they want to do so or not or not

Cr. He expressed his desire to “Cr.” and her chest G was tightly pushed down one time by hand.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officials concerning the handling of reports and the maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

[2017 Highest 5259]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D;

1. On-site dispatch reports;

1. Investigation report (investigation into victims and CCTV-related crimes);

1. A photograph of a CCTV course (2017 upper end 6352);

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police in relation to G;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (a CCTV image investigation at the scene);

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;

arrow