1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasoning for the court's explanation concerning this case is that "61,580,520 won (including additional tax 14,149,416 won)" of 61,580,520 won (including additional tax 14,149,416), "2,689,214,080 won (including additional tax 635,372,494 won)" of 17, and "2,689,214,080 won (including additional tax 635,372,494 won)" of 2, 16 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deleted, and the part of 3, 5-7 of the 3, 5, and 7, shall be cited as it is for the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of the following items after the 3, 3, 7, and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The addition;

F. Of the instant disposition, the head of Suwon District Tax Office revoked the imposition of KRW 14,149,416 for an illegal underreporting additional tax and the imposition of KRW 635,372,494 for an illegal underreporting additional tax for a second term portion of the Value-Added Tax in 2010 for each of the instant disposition, and issued a corrective disposition imposing KRW 158,843,123 for an ordinary underreporting additional tax for a second term portion of the value-added tax in 2010 for a second term portion of the instant disposition.

(2) The Plaintiff’s appeal is dismissed on the grounds that the Plaintiff’s appeal is justifiable. In so doing, the Plaintiff’s appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on December 1, 201.