beta
Text
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. According to the summary of the reasons for appeal, the defendant does not constitute an injury even if the defendant acknowledged that he/she inflicted an imminent injury on the victim D, such as the facts charged, for two weeks of medical treatment.
The court below erred in the misapprehension of facts.
2. Determination
A. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is Cump truck article, and the victim D is a dump truck article, and the victim D works together with F as a general manager of E-company with limited liability.
The Defendant, at around 11:00 on July 19, 2016, committed a dispute with the Defendant’s Hamba I Hamba in the company EF located in the Namnam Navy G, EF, the Defendant, while continuing to dispute with the Defendant, “A victim is suffering from why he did not work during the working hours.”
He/she shall hear the words "," and inquire about the meaning of "n't,"
“In doing so, “the left side of the drinking is to display the victim’s left side, and the victim’s left side is pushed down on the Defendant’s left side, and the victim’s left side was placed at one time, and the victim’s two-day medical treatment was required.”
B. The judgment of the court below is that ① the assault inflicted on the victim by the defendant does not seem to have much impact on the victim's face face in light of its circumstances, ② the victim was visited to the MMa Ma Ma L on the day of the assault committed by the defendant only once and received pharmacologic treatment and prescription, and the victim did not receive any specific treatment thereafter, ③ even according to the diagnosis of the victim's injury, it seems that ordinary activities and meals are limited. ④ The victim is also in the court of the court of the court of the court of the court below, ④ even though he took several pains from the defendant, he did not have serious degree of pains, and there was no serious obstacle to daily life, and there was no significant obstacle to daily life.
Based on the statement, the wife suffered by the victim of this case does not constitute “injury” in the crime of injury.
In view of the facts charged in the instant case, there is no proof of criminal facts.