The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On December 24, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 23:47, 2017, on the street in front of the exit of 1, Yancheon-si, Yancheon-si, B (59 years old); and (b) on the day when the Defendant filed a civil petition against this unauthorized construction, the victim B (59 years old); (c) on the one hand, on the part of the victim’s entrance, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim by taking approximately four weeks on the part of the victim’s entrance.

2. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the record of the instant case, it is insufficient to recognize that the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone, as stated in the instant facts charged, was proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the Defendant inflicted bodily injury on the victim, such as a flag of a baby requiring approximately four weeks medical treatment, by drinking the victim once, as stated in the instant facts charged, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge otherwise.

A. The victim, at the investigative agency, found that the defendant, who was drinking in a day-to-day table and drinking in a day-to-day table, francing the alcohol prior to drinking, set up the defendant and talked about the defendant's containing a civil petition against an illegal building, and when the defendant was found to have been on the part of drinking, even if the defendant was on the part of drinking, he did so. After that, the victim did not memory that the member of the crime prevention group, who followed the defendant's face at the time when he returned to the fighting, gave rise to a few times.

The Defendant stated to the effect that the one time price around the Defendant’s entrance was “I will not accurately memory anywhere because they were drinking,” and in this court, “I would like to challenge the Defendant’s civil petition. I would like to see that the Defendant first asked for an oral entry, and then the situation was not well memory.”