logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.03.21 2017고단3635
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2017 Highest 3635] On June 13, 2017, the Defendant confirmed the victim C, who was under influence of alcohol, in the Seoul Station platform of 392 subway No. 4 of the Yongsan-gu Seoul, Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, about 23:3-00:10, that he did not have any person in the surrounding area, and then laid off the Defendant, in the outer speculative machine, knife the Defendant’s knife on the market price with 20,000 won in cash.

L. A. L. theft was committed.

[2017 Highest 4126]

1. From August 11, 2017 to 18:00, the Defendant: (a) committed theft with a cell phone in order to prevent cash withdrawal at the 7th point of the NongHywon Station, the NongHywon-gu Confucian School located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the Defendant: (b) cut off the victim D’s instant cell phone in the order of Samsung 7,000,000, the market value of which is equivalent to KRW 800,000,000 between the parties.

2. On August 12, 2017, the Defendant damaged the property at G convenience stores managed by the Victim FF in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the Defendant did not harm the amount of charging transportation cards, and the Defendant did not demand the amount of charging transportation cards, and the Defendant left the column two times in the glass window with the stone straws outside the door, and damaged the victim’s property.

[2017 Highest 4643] On August 9, 2017, at the top of “J” located within the I station in Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul around 14:10 on August 9, 2017, the Defendant: (a) destroyed the victim K’s market price of KRW 9,900, which was displayed outside the upper world by taking advantage of the gaps in surveillance of the victim K.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement [2017 order 3635];

1. Statement made by the police with regard to C [2017 senior order 4126];

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A written statement;

1. Photographs of each on-site damage (2017 Height 4643);

1. A written statement of the victim of K;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of crime scene;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for each type of crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The defendant's reasons for sentencing of Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act reflects his/her fault in depth.

arrow