logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2013.07.04 2013고단1975
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등폭행)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant was close to the victim C (ma, 41 years old and 41 years old) and the defendant, who was aware of while acting on behalf of the defendant around 2008, such as managing the monthly salary of the victim.

1. On November 201, 2010, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective, deadly weapon, etc.) (a crime) committed an act of assaulting five times, following the Defendant’s vehicle, on the ground that the Defendant retired from his/her previous work at night at night on November 201, 2010, he/she made a false statement, such as not speaking the Defendant, even if the Defendant retired from his/her previous work.

2. On October 201, 201, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (collective, deadly weapons, etc.) (collective, deadly weapons, etc.) on the ground that the victim retired from his/her existing occupation at night and continued to drink and did not properly manage health, on the ground that he/she did not properly perform his/her duties, at night around ten (0) days before the date and at night, the Defendant committed an assault at five (5) times in the victim’s tark-gu E apartment, Nam-gu, Nam-gu. on the ground that the victim retired from his/her existing occupation and continued to drink and did not properly perform health management.

3. On March 2012, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (a collective, deadly weapon, etc.) and assaulting the Defendant: (a) at the parking lot in front of Samsung Motor Agent in the south-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Ulsan Metropolitan City at night around March 2012, the Defendant: (b) on the ground that the Defendant did not follow the Defendant’s promise because the victim did not attend the work despite having to avoid drinking prior to the Defendant; and (c) did not follow the Defendant’s promise because the victim did not undergo health management by drinking alcohol while drinking alcohol; and (d) the Defendant did not follow the Defendant’s promise at night; (b) the Defendant diversdd the victim the victim, who was carrying with him, alkinium fump discharge net, which is a dangerous object, such as the above paragraph on which the Defendant was carrying, five times the victim’s am her possession, and immediately thereafter, the Defendant

arrow