logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.07.06 2016가단125712
차임반환청구 등
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Basic Facts

The network E engaged in textile occupation with the trade name of “F,” and upon the death of December 26, 2013, the Defendant B, his spouse, and the Defendant C and D, his children, respectively, have succeeded to the ratio of 3/7 shares and 2/7 shares.

피고 B는 망 E이 사망하자 망 E의 사업을 인수하여 2014. 1. 13. ‘G’로 변경한 후 니트 편직용 싱글 기계 36"2대(모델명 : SS-S4 싱글 4F 36인치 144Feed, 제조사 삼에스기계 주식회사) 등을 사용하면서 섬유사업을 하여 왔다.

[Ground of recognition] In the absence of dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 3, 5, 6, Eul evidence Nos. 5 and 6 (including each serial number, if any), and the plaintiff's assertion of the purport of the whole argument as to the plaintiff's whole purport of the pleading to H, the plaintiff's spouse, around March 2008, "I would like to operate a textile plant, and I would like to pay rent of KRW 2.5 million per month if I would like to lend two parts of a Chinese and Chinese letter-based machinery to the plaintiff's spouse, because one's circumstance is difficult, and if I would like to operate a fiber factory, I would like to pay rent of KRW 30 million per month. The two parts of the middle and high letter-based machinery can be considered as KRW 4 million per machine, and the monthly revenue of KRW 4 million per machine could be reduced to KRW 2.5 million per month."

He, on March 14, 2008, remitted KRW 5 million to I, a seller of the instant machinery, and from March 21, 2008.

3. 23.까지 망인에게 나머지 기계대금 합계 2,500만 원을 송금하여 니트 편직용 싱글 기계 36"2대(모델명 : SS-S4 싱글 4F 36인치 144Feed, 제조사 삼에스기계 주식회사, 이하 ‘이 사건 기계’라 한다)를 매수하고, 2008. 4.경 망 E에게 월 임료 250만 원, 임대기간 2008. 4. 1.부터 2013. 3. 31.까지로 각 정하여 임대하였고, 피고 B는 망 E이 2013. 12. 26. 사망하자 이 사건 기계의 임대인의 지위를 승계하였다.

Therefore, the Defendants, the deceased E’s co-inheritors, are obliged to pay the overdue charge to the Plaintiff, and Defendant B, who succeeded to the status of the lessee of the network E, has the obligation to deliver the instant machinery.

Provided, That the certificate No. 1 (mechanic lease agreement) is a document to recognize the authenticity of the contract.

arrow