logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.03.17 2016고정1193
허위공문서작성등
Text

The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is a public official of the head of Ulsan-gu Office E and F of the F, and a person in charge of the construction of “I” access roads to H villages located in Ulsan-gu G G workers, Ulsan-gu.

On August 24, 2015, the Defendant notified the residents of certain H village including L who wish to change the above access road to the “K” located in the JJ, on the ground that the existing access road project is in operation, but the Defendant was ordered by the head of North Korea, who continued to file a civil petition, to visit the above access road site and to check whether or not he/she consented to the change of the route by visiting the residents and visiting the above access road site and confirming whether or not he/she consented to the change of the route.

1. On September 7, 2015, the Defendant prepared a false official document, stating as follows: (a) although there was no fact that there was no confirmation as to whether the Defendant changed the route of the access road to the above H village from “I” to “K” from the neighboring residents of the access road adjacent to the access road to “I”; (b) under the title, “the opinion of the residents of the residents of the access road to H village” using the North-Gu office E and office computers located in the Ulsanbuk-gu industry, Ulsanbuk-gu, and “the opinion of the residents of the access road to H village”; (c) a total of 22 households [the 17 households, 17 households, 4 households, and empty houses]; (d) the address of the 22 households in the main column; (c) the names of the residents of each household in the sexual name column; (d) the 17 households in the remarks column; and (e) the dissenting and four households are vacant houses.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the defendant prepares a false statement of the residents' opinion on the change of the access road to H Village.

2. On September 7, 2015, the Defendant issued a false official document to the above M, who was aware of the fact that he/she made a false document at the office E and office of the above North-gu office, and submitted the written opinion of the residents of HL village access route modification as if he/she made a false document and exercised it.

2. Determination

A. The crime of preparation of a false official document in the relevant legal doctrine.

arrow