logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2013.07.25 2013고정367
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is running the business of disposal of laundry while operating the "C", and the victim D is a person living in south of Korea.

The victim D did not exercise pressure as if it did not enter into a contract with the laundry business entity that operates its own punishment, by finding the hospital that has dealt with the laundry by concluding the contract with C.

Nevertheless, on October 8, 2012, the Defendant had access to the Internet at the F C Office located in the 2012. On the other hand, the Defendant had no choice but to change the company without any choice on the ground that the reporter, who participated in the bulletin board of the Supreme Prosecutors' Office website, the bulletin board of the free speech board of the Supreme Prosecutors' Office, the Internet, the next bulletin board of the Google, etc., failed to meet the qualification requirements, and that the reporter was ordered as if he were to find the hospital and to gather news, and that he was forced to change the company without any choice.The hospital related person caused the loss of the reputation of the victim by revealing publicly false facts through the information and communications network.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Details of facsimile transmission letters and content of online posts;

1. Report on internal investigation (the details of telephone communications with the head of General Affairs of the G Hospital);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (content of telephone conversations for reference H);

1. Article 70 (2) of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. concerning facts constituting a crime and Article 70 of the same Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow