logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2020.06.24 2019고단2884
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than three months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who worked at a teahouse in Gyeongsung-gun B as an employee.

1. Around January 30, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim D, stating that “If the parent’s parents borrowed KRW 10,000,000,000 as he/she was urgently required to engage in annoying fying, annoyinginging, and lending the money to the victim, the Defendant would complete payment after one year.”

However, at the time of fact, there was no circumstance that the parent of the defendant's parent was in need of the excessive amount of money, and there was no intention or ability to repay as promised even if the defendant borrowed money from the victim because it was thought that the defendant would return his personal debt from the victim, and that the money should not be returned as above.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as seen above, by deceiving the victim, obtained 10,000,000 won from the victim, that is, by cash, from the victim, and acquired 60,50,000 won in total from the time until January 19, 2013, from the time to time, and acquired 7 times, such as the list of crimes Nos. 1 through 7.

2. On September 16, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim of the instant C teahouse that “The Defendant would refund KRW 2 million to the Defendant, who is a shop partner, on a prompt basis, at the time of the lending of money to the Defendant.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have received a request from a person who borrowed money from a person who borrowed money from the victim, and had the idea to avoid returning the Defendant’s personal debt, and had to prevent such return, and there was no intention or ability to repay the money as promised even if the Defendant borrowed money from the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant deceivings the victim as above and borrowed money from the victim on September 17, 2012.

arrow