Text
1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 102,616,860 and the interest rate of KRW 15% per annum from November 7, 2015 to the date of full payment.
Reasons
1. The facts under the judgment as to the cause of the claim are as follows, or there is no dispute between the parties, pursuant to the purport of each entry and whole pleading of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 7 (including a serial number; hereinafter the same shall apply).
The Plaintiff is a management body established by consisting of all sectional owners pursuant to the Act on the Ownership and Management of Aggregate Buildings that manage the building, site and attached facilities in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, and the Defendant bears the obligation to pay management expenses pursuant to the management rules as co-owners operating the “E” in subparagraph B201 under the above building’s underground. The Defendant did not pay the total amount of KRW 102,610,860 from October 2014 to September 2015.
According to the above facts, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff 102,616,860 won in arrears management expenses and damages for delay calculated by the rate of 15% per annum from November 7, 2015 to the day of complete payment, which is the day following the delivery date of a copy of the complaint of this case filed by the plaintiff after the date of delinquency.
2. On the defendant's argument, the defendant asserts that the amount of management expenses claimed by the plaintiff is not acceptable, since the ground for calculation is not clear and excessive.
However, the defendant's argument alone is difficult to reverse the judgment in the preceding paragraph, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.
Rather, according to the purport of the evidence Nos. 3, 6, 7, and 13 and the entire pleadings, the Plaintiff claimed the calculation content separately from the “management expenses notice”, and it appears that the other sectional owners filed a claim for the same content. The other sectional owners seem to have not raised any particular objection, and the Plaintiff’s management expenses and arguments against Nonparty F, the other co-owners of Seoul Northern District Court 2014Gahap25829 by the Seoul Northern District Court 2013 to September 2014.