Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, for one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants conspired to borrow money from the victim D who became aware of after being introduced from Marcara to the business relationship between husband and wife.

On July 23, 2013, the Defendants are providing the victims with "Seoul F F building 109 dong 110 F building 10 dong 10, and there is insufficient money to purchase bail, etc.

B Entry into the Republic of Korea after lending USD 300,000 Hong Kong ($ 45,00,000), as security, to keep a half of the amount of KRW 600,000,000,000,000,000

7. Until 30. 30. 3% interest will be paid.

The Defendants made a false statement as “” and Defendant A prepared a loan certificate. However, the Defendants did not go against the Defendant’s obligation as collateral, but did not have any intent or ability to make a full payment, even if they borrowed money from the victim due to bad credit standing. The Defendants were immediately given cash payment from the victim. On July 26, 2013, the Defendants continued to make a false statement to the effect that “The amount of KRW 200,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,00.

However, in fact, since the above real estate has a significant shortage in value as a collateral and is registered as a joint share in the name of Defendant A and I, even if the sales contract was prepared, it was impossible to transfer the entire real estate in the name of the whole real estate. At the time, the Defendants did not have any intent or ability to complete payment even if they borrowed money from the victim with bad credit standing.

The Defendants, as such, deceiving the victims, thereby bringing about USD 300,000 in cash from the victims to KRW 45 million.