The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (four months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. A favorable circumstance is that the defendant recognized his mistake and reflected his mistake, and the victims do not want the punishment of the defendant.

On the other hand, the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case even though he was sentenced to a suspended sentence due to a crime of interference with the performance of official duties in the past, and committed again the crime of this case even though he was sentenced to a fine for the crime of assault after the suspended sentence, and committed again the crime of this case after being prosecuted for committing the crime of crime as provided in paragraph (1) of the crime of this case in the judgment below. In light of such circumstances, the defendant's awareness of compliance is very weak and is highly likely to repeat again.

They look at the disadvantage of the state.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, family relationship, and various sentencing conditions as shown in the instant records and arguments, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless.