A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 29, 2010, the criminal defendant against the victim C was urged to pay the price from the business partners, such as the victim CE in Namyang-si, Namyang-si, and (State) F, etc. on or around October 29, 2010, the defendant did not have the ability to pay the price of the goods within two months during the period during which the loan amounted to KRW 130 million from KRW 150 million from KRW 100 million, and the liability to the other business partners has been accumulated in a considerable amount of parts, and the profits from the sale of the goods received were returned to the above obligation or used for approximately KRW 10 million from KRW 10 million for the office operating expenses and living expenses. However, even if the profits from the sale of the goods received were to be used for the purpose of using approximately KRW 721,600,000 per month, the victim was supplied from the victim with industrial storage batteries at that time.

In addition, the Defendant received a total of KRW 16,984,00 from the above date to June 19, 2012 by the same method as indicated in the annexed list of crimes, and received a delivery of industrial storage batteries equivalent to KRW 16,984,00 in total.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. On November 201, 201, the Defendant against the Victim G was urged to pay the price from the I agency in the operation of the Victim G G in Ansan-si, and from the customer such as F, the Defendant was at the time of the Defendant’s demand for payment of the price. The Defendant did not have the ability to pay the price of the goods within one month because the obligation of the loan is equivalent to KRW 150 million and the obligation to the other customer was accumulated with a considerable amount of accumulated part of the obligation to the other customer. The profit from selling the goods received was for the purpose of preventing the Defendant from returning the said obligation by referring to the above obligation or using approximately KRW 10 million for the office operation expenses and daily living expenses. However, even if the profit from selling the goods received was for the purpose of preventing the Defendant from returning the said obligation or using approximately KRW 10,000,000 per month, it is false as if the victim could pay the price