logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2018.05.04 2017고합186 (1)
특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(사기)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than three years and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

D is the largest shareholder and the joint representative of the Bank of Bank of Mine E, which is located in Pyeongtaek-si E, and the defendant has overall control over the business affairs of the above company from November 201 to September 2014, 2014. G was in charge of the business affairs of the above company as the joint representative of the Bank of Bank F, and G was in charge of the above company's financial-related affairs. H was the representative of the Court of Justice in the case of harmony.

1. Defendant and G, D, and K are liable for a loan of approximately KRW 6 billion in the amount of interest per month, and they were paying KRW 60 million in the amount of interest per month. In addition, Defendant and G, D, and K were willing to obtain a loan from the Korea Development Bank by providing false security, such as purchase of facilities and payment of personnel expenses.

Accordingly, the Defendant planned and led to the entire crime with D, and had a close relationship with D.

J has had the representative H provide the Korea Development Bank with the machinery to provide false security, and G and K have recruited to prepare evidentiary documents necessary for the provision of false security.

Defendant

On December 10, 2013, G, D, and K loaned KRW 1 billion from the Korea Development Bank for industrial operation funds from the victims of the Korea Development Bank in the F Office of the F Office of the F Office of the F Office of the F Office of the F Office of the above Dispute Resolution, and the mortgage and transfer security rights under the Factory Mortgage Act were established for 19 machinery and equipment, including 1 billion won for industrial operation funds.

However, in fact, two or more of the above Cl bargaining machinery and two of the Cl bargaining machinery were not the machinery owned by the KF, and as if the KF purchased the above four machinery from J, it is forged a equipment supply contract, estimate, tax invoice, and D confirms that the entire machinery and equipment is our machinery and equipment in D’s “equipment and machinery list.”

The phrase "" was written and submitted to the appraisal corporation to the appraisal corporation, and the F.C. was the same as the owner of the above four machinery.

The Defendant, in collusion with G, D, and K, deceives the victims of the Korea Development Bank and belongs thereto.

arrow