1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The plaintiff's claim extended in the trial is dismissed.

3.In the trial, the trial shall be held.

1. Basic facts

A. B, on July 28, 2003, driven a scenario car (hereinafter “instant vehicle”) in the vicinity of a wooden bridge located in Yangcheon-gu Seoul, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, and caused injury to the Plaintiff, who is the seater of the instant vehicle, by shocking other vehicles going on the front bank, while driving a U-turn in an area where U-turn is not allowed, and driving the instant vehicle on the front bank, and caused injury to the Plaintiff, who is the seater of the instant vehicle, such as brain micum, finite, finite, 4-5, 5, and 5-Tin No. 1 in the YY.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)

The Defendant is an insurer who has concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the instant vehicle.

C. On October 6, 2003, the Plaintiff received KRW 2,985,00 from the Defendant as “all legal damages (including direct treatment expenses) due to the instant traffic accident” and agreed with the Defendant to waive all rights related to the instant accident and not file a civil or criminal lawsuit or objection.

(hereinafter “instant agreement”) D.

On April 16, 2004, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in C Hospital due to high blood pressure hearts and bedne kidy disease, etc., but on April 23, 2004, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as the escape certificate of a conical signboard (hereinafter referred to as “instant conical signboard escape certificate”) between the right side of the C-4 as a result of the examination on the scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scop

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, entry of Gap's 1 through 10, the purport of whole pleading

2. The defendant's judgment on the defense before the merits was unlawful since the plaintiff agreed with the defendant to file a lawsuit in relation to the compensation for damages caused by the accident of this case, since the lawsuit of this case was filed against the agreement on the lawsuit of this case.

With regard to the murdered and illegal damage compensation, the victim is specified between the perpetrator and the victim.