beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Around December 13, 2018, the Defendant written a letter to the effect that “The 2019 Highest 559,” by accessing the building E and the Defendant’s residential area to G carbook from the mobile phone at the Defendant’s residential area, sold in KRW 300,000,” and then, the Defendant would send the above ticket to the victim I who reported and contacted the above fact by mail if he deposits in KRW 300,000.
In fact, the Defendant did not possess the above Tweet, and was planning to use the above Tweet as living expenses, etc., so the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to sell the above Tweet to the victim. Nevertheless, at around 20:54 of the same day from the victim by deceiving the above victim, the Defendant received 300,000 won as the price for the above Tweet under the name of the Defendant (K) from around 23 times to January 7, 2019, along with the transfer of 6,41,00 won in total from the victims from around 23 times as shown in the list of crimes in the attached list of crimes. The Defendant, “ at a place where the location cannot be known at around 05:0 on January 2, 2019,” the Defendant sold G Tweet, even if he did not have any intent or ability to sell Tweet.
The phrase “” posted the victim’s writing, and it acquired KRW 1.50,000 from the victim’s M to the Nbank account (Account NumberO) in return for the transaction of goods. The Defendant, around January 11, 2019, “2019No. 1136”, by accessing the victim’s P (e.g., the age 21) by a mobile phone connected to the G car page from the French land of Gyeonggi-do to the mobile phone, and then by linking the victim’s P (e.g., the age 21) to the said car page at the 2nd 2/91st o’s size.
The phrase “to send a musical ticket number to the above victim if deposit KRW 171,00 to the above victim” was false.
However, in fact, the defendant was not in possession of the above diskettes, and the above money was received from the victim and living expenses.