logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원경주지원 2017.06.29 2015가단14351
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The Defendant paid KRW 3,712,55 to the Plaintiff KRW 5% per annum from December 4, 2014 to June 29, 2017.

Reasons

1. On December 4, 2014, at around 15:00, the Plaintiff: (a) loaded a freight B 2.5 tons of 2.5 tons of a vehicle parked along the side (hereinafter “victimed vehicle”) on the side of the side from the road between the Si-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-si in Ansan-si to the front of the damaged vehicle (hereinafter “victim”) on the front of the 35 tons of the 2-laneed truck running along the same direction; and (b) caused the injury, such as the 6 chest-chill, etc., to the end of the damaged vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 3, 5, 12, Eul evidence No. 1 (including additional numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the occurrence of liability for damages and the recognition of the above restriction, the driver of the vehicle in the household is negligent in neglecting his/her duty at the time of front-time, and the defendant is an insurer who has entered into an automobile insurance contract for damages with the vehicle in the household, and is liable for the damages suffered by the plaintiff

However, in light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the above evidence, that is, the driver of the victimized vehicle D, “I stop the vehicle and stop the vehicle for more than 1 to 2 minutes in order to carry out the work of installing a sand bridge for snow removal on the bridge. One person stated that the vehicle was sent away from 15 meters behind the back of the vehicle.” The driver of the vehicle E stated that “I find that the damaged vehicle was late to stop on the side of the second line before 200 meters in advance of the damaged vehicle,” and that the injury suffered by the driver of the damaged vehicle is relatively minor, the driver of the damaged vehicle is relatively minor, despite the duty to guide the vehicle by posting the control water at the later side of 30 meters in loading and leaving the road. However, it erred by failing to take sufficient measures to do so, and by failing to do so, the Plaintiff’s fault.

arrow