A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 19:50 on August 15, 2012, the Defendant, while drunkly drinking a blood alcohol concentration of 0.192%, driven B new-land car from the front line of the mutually French-dong in Gwangju Northernbuk-gu to the front road in the same Dong, computed in the same region, from the front line of the mutually French-dong in the same region.

2. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act: (a) drive the said B New-B franchise vehicle without mandatory insurance at the above date, time, and place.

3. On December 2, 2011, the Defendant violated the Automobile Management Act: (a) did not apply for the registration of transfer of the ownership of a motor vehicle without justifiable grounds while taking over the said B new franchiser car registered in the motor vehicle register in the motor vehicle register in the middle and

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on detection of, and investigation into, a host driver (application of the Radmark);

1. Application of mandatory insurance provisions (B) and the register of automobiles (B)-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Articles 148-2 (2) 2 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of sound driving), Articles 81 subparagraph 2 and 12 (1) of the Automobile Management Act (the point of application for registration of transfer of ownership on a motor vehicle), Article 46 (2) and the main sentence of Article 8 of the former Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act (amended by Act No. 11369, Feb. 22, 2012); Articles 86 (2) and 8 of the former Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act (amended by Act No. 11369

1. From among concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2 and (2), and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (Aggravated Punishment for Concurrent Crimes concerning Violation of the Road Traffic Act with the largest punishment);

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation is that the Defendant driven a motor vehicle in a high alcohol level of 0.192%, which is favorable to the reasons for sentencing following the sentencing. As above, the Defendant’s shocking the motor vehicle while driving the motor vehicle in the state of their driving in the state of their driving so that the amount of KRW 3,111,291 and KRW 2,100,000 for each repair cost is damaged.