The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) is that the Defendant did not drink at the time of the instant traffic accident, and that the Defendant parked in another place after the said traffic accident and carried cans at the same time on the road back to the scene of the accident.

Therefore, the Defendant did not drive alcohol.

2. Determination:

A. The lower court’s judgment: (a) the following circumstances are as follows; (b) the Defendant caused the instant traffic accident that shocks the left-hand side of the Defendant’s vehicle into the lower-hand side of the vehicle driven by E; (c) the Defendant left the site and parked a vehicle in any other place; and (d) the Defendant returned to the scene of the accident after having arrived at the police; (c) it is difficult to easily understand that the Defendant, who caused the traffic accident, would be suspected of drinking alcohol and drinking alcohol at the risk of being suspected of driving the vehicle by drinking; and (d) the Defendant would be unable to drink the alcohol level at 0.76% of his blood alcohol level for 10 minutes; and (d) the Defendant’s assertion that the instant accident occurred within the point of the traffic accident after leaving the site to the lower-hand side of the vehicle; and (e) the Defendant would have proceeded to the extent of 65 meters away from the road site to the extent of 10 meters away from the point of the traffic accident to the point of the vehicle; and (d) the Defendant’s height to the end 30 G.