The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months) of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the judgment of the defendant is against his/her duty of care when he/she led to the confession of the crime, the health status of the defendant is not good, the victim H and I also seem to have some aspects of neglecting his/her duty of care in the course of land trade with the defendant.

However, the crime of this case is committed by deceiving the victims to take money from the victims as the purchase price of land or above-ground trees, and the nature of the crime is not less than that of the victim, and the total amount of damage is about KRW 310 million,00,000,000,000,000, and despite the fact that damage has not yet been recovered until the trial (it is submitted by each written agreement to the effect that the victim H, I, and S is not punished by the defendant in the trial, but it is not deemed that the actual agreement was actually made for the recovery of damage of this case, and it is not deemed that the damage has not been recovered in light of the content of the agreement and the content of the implementation letter attached to the agreement, etc., and it does not seem that the defendant has the same criminal records and three times, and it is not deemed that the defendant has the same criminal records and three times. In full view of the various circumstances that are the conditions for sentencing, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, motive and means of the crime, and the subsequent circumstances

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.