A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 5, 2014, the Defendant, at around 17:10, at the 'D cafeteria' of the 6th floor of the building located in Kuri-si, around 17:10, the Defendant, while drinking with the victim E (inn, 32 years of age), F and alcohol, had been suffering from the victim's illness while she was suffering from the victim's illness, and the victim got his/her head on the wall of the victim's disease and got his/her face on the part of the victim's disease.

As a result, the defendant injured the victim about two weeks of treatment, which requires two-time treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Bodily damaged photo;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the screen after a CCTV closure;

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] There is no basic area (2 to 4 years) (2 to 2 years) of the category 1 (2 to 4 years) of habitual injury, repeated injury, special injury (a habitual injury, repeated injury, special injury) (a special person) (a special person) (a decision of sentence) (a decision of sentence] Defendant’s act should be criticized as dangerous, and no agreement was reached with the victim, and no agreement was made with the victim.

However, the defendant also tried to reduce the amount by taking into account the favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant had been faced with the victim at the time, the crime of this case was caused by contingency, the fact that the defendant repents and reflects his mistake, deposited one million won for the victim, and the defendant has no criminal records subject to suspended execution or heavier punishment, and ordered social service in order to give him an opportunity to return to his mistake.

In addition, the records and arguments of this case, such as the age, character and conduct of the defendant, the details and motive leading to the crime of this case, and the circumstances before and after the crime.