logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2013.10.30 2013고단830
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치사상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 13, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of two million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Cheongju District Court on December 13, 2007; on July 18, 2008, a summary order of four million won for the same crime, etc. at the Cheongju District Court on July 18, 2008; on August 23, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months for the same crime, etc. at the Cheongju District Court on August 23, 20

8. 31. The decision becomes final and conclusive and is currently suspended.

Criminal facts

1. Notwithstanding the fact that the Defendant was punished three times for the violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) and the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) and the driver’s license was revoked on December 26, 2007, the Defendant was driving a Cgallon vehicle under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.210% without a driver’s license on a section of approximately 1.42 km to Cgallon under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.210% under the influence of alcohol concentration without a driver’s license on a section of about 1.42 km, from April 5, 2013 to the front of the 25 ambling point in the Heung-gu Soakdong-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death or Injury caused by Dalggal Driving) is engaged in driving motor vehicles;

Around 05:45 on April 5, 2013, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, proceeded two lanes in front of the CU convenience point in the PU convenience of Cheongju-si, Priju-si, along two-lanes from the side of the FU convenience hospital.

At the time of night, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle is unable to drive the motor vehicle normally due to influence of drinking, and there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by thoroughly operating the steering and operating the steering system and accurately.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol level of 0.210%, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol and was negligent in driving when he neglected such duty of care, and was under the stop at the two-lane edges of the motor vehicle that the Defendant is driving.

arrow