Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a visible vehicle B.

On December 20, 2019, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 18:50 on December 20, 2019, and entered the back road near Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, into the four-lane road in front of the building, and made the U.S. in one-lane.

In that case, the safety zone of yellow solid lines is installed at a one-lane, so in such a case, even though a person engaged in driving is not obliged to enter a safety zone in which the entry of a vehicle is prohibited, the defendant neglected to do so and went along the two-lanes of the above road by negligence, which caused the safety zone to proceed in the opposite lane, and the victim who entered the safety zone in order to avoid collision with the vehicle of the defendant's driver, went over the floor by shocking the upper right side of the two-wheeled vehicle at 125 :00 . E. 125 .0 .0 . . . . .

The Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt, tension, etc. in need of medical treatment for about two weeks due to occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Results of the CD reproduction and viewing;

1. Statement of the occurrence of the traffic accident by F and G;

1. A traffic accident report, a scene photograph of the accident, and a photograph by cutting down the course;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Each internal investigation report and investigation report [the accident in this case is not caused by the intrusion of the safety zone, and even if the accident in this case occurred even if the safety zone was invaded, it is argued that it does not fall under subparagraph 1 of Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents because it is necessary to avoid it due to its speed, so it does not correspond to subparagraph 1 of Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents. In particular, according to the records confirmed by video, it seems that the defendant has been operating very rapidly with the damaged Oba, but the defendant has entered the road and the 90-lane as the 3-lane as the 1st place for the

(k) damage;