Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, each of the above defendants is against the defendants for one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants are members of the sexual violence organization and the behavioral members of the sexual wave.

The victim C(25 years of age) and D, while running E-Posing vehicles together, D borrowed money to the bond company as collateral for the victim's getting off, and in the process, Defendant B guaranteed the debt.

However, Defendant B, who did not pay the money, received a demand call from the bond company to pay the debt, and Defendant B, who got the victim to receive money from the victim with the fact that the victim is operating the D and pool business.

On June 2014, the Defendants: (a) moved the victim from the party room located in Ansan-si to the 30 minutes waiting for the victim; (b) on the same day, around 21:00 on the same day, the Defendants moved the victim to the sloping-dong Park located in Ansan-si.

In the scambling of the Sscamon Park, Defendant B showed the attitude that Defendant B would be able to write the scam and write the scam with the victim, and Defendant B said that “D would have lent KRW 2 million to Escam with its own escam, and I am scambling, and that this escam was carried out by Escam, and that he would have paid back the money instead of he has paid off the money.”

In addition, the defendant A added it to the defendant A, and he did so on the side of the defendant B.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly threatened the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to C

1. Article 2 (2) and (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. The fact that each of the defendants with reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code of the suspended sentence can have the same penal power, etc. is disadvantageous, but the fact that the defendants recognized the facts charged and reflects his/her mistake, the fact that the defendants agreed smoothly with the victim, and other circumstances shown in the records, such as the defendants' age, character and behavior, and family environment.