Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

When the above fine is not paid, the defendant shall be the defendant for 10 days.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is between the victim C (34 years of age, women) and the married couple on December 13, 2015.

On September 7, 2016, the Defendant made food at home at the victim’s house located in his own house of 101 Dong-dong 704, 101, 704, around 23:0 on September 7, 2016.

Although it was proposed, the victim abused the victim as he takes flaps and takes flaps of the victim on the ground that the victim refuses.

Summary of Evidence

1. The legal statement of the witness C;

1. Part C of the protocol concerning the interrogation of the suspect against the defendant

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Complaint;

1. As to the Defendant’s assertion on the investigation report (the confirmation of the content of text transmission with the victim) on the day of the instant case, the Defendant argued that there was no physical contact with each other as a matter of preparation of food on the day of the instant case.

C. The victim made a statement consistent with the facts charged in the instant case. The victim made a statement that is consistent with the aforementioned facts, i.e., the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence, i.e., the victim's attitude and behavior (the victim's attitude and behavior after the date of the marital fighting, notified the mother of the violence to the mother at the time following the date of the marital fighting, and demanding the prevention of recurrence by finding the mother at the same time), the victim's active interval between the time (the time of the marital fighting at the night after 23 cc, and the time after the time of the war, the victim's attitude and behavior by telephone to the mother is immediately following the next day) do not go against the ordinary attitude and behavior that the party can take right immediately after the marital fighting, and ② the mother who received the victim's claim that the defendant had exercised violence to the victim was directly and seriously selling the victim to the victim.

misunderstanding the victim, the victim responded to the Kakao Stockholm text to the effect that he did not know about the misunderstanding of the victim's misunderstanding, but that he did not know about the misunderstanding of the victim's misunderstanding, and that it was violence, ③ marital fighting in this case.