beta
Text
1. The defendant's notary public against the plaintiff A, B, and C is a law firm Japanese 206 No. 388 of June 20, 2006.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. (1) On June 19, 2006, the Defendant lent 20 million won to Plaintiff B at interest rate of 30% per annum. Accordingly, Plaintiff B’s mother A and wife Plaintiff C were jointly and severally guaranteed.
(2) On June 20, 2006, the plaintiff B, as the representative of the plaintiff A and C, who is the joint and several surety, entrusted the notary public with the preparation of a notarial deed to the effect that the debtor, the joint and several surety, and the plaintiff B, the joint and several surety, if the debtor, the joint and several surety, did not perform this obligation, the notary public entered into a notarial deed on the money consumer loan agreement of No. 388 of 2006, which was signed by the law firm, as the same day.
B. (1) On June 26, 2007, the defendant set a loan of KRW 20 million to the plaintiff B at 36% per annum, and the plaintiff A and the plaintiff's fraudulent D were jointly and severally guaranteed.
(2) On June 26, 2007, the plaintiff B, as the agent of the plaintiff A and D, who is the joint and several surety, entrusted the notary public with the preparation of a notarial deed to the effect that the debtor, the joint and several surety, and the plaintiff B, the joint and several surety, in the event that the debtor, the joint and several surety, did not perform this obligation, the notary public entered into a notarial deed under the Monetary Loan Agreement No. 452, No. 452, 2007, which was the same day.
C. Plaintiff B by October 2008
(1) The loans described in subsection (1) and b.
Although the agreed interest on each of the loans mentioned in paragraph (1) (hereinafter “each of the loans of this case”) was paid, the Plaintiff failed to repay the principal and interest of this case from November 2008 to June 13, 201. Accordingly, the Plaintiff A repaid the principal of the loans of this case by June 13, 201, and on June 13, 2011, repaid the amount of KRW 10 million from the Defendant to B to the obligor, and the obligor paid the difference in the amount of KRW 3,000,000 per month.