logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원고등법원 2021.01.14 2020나13300
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and the appeal shall be 1.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the part of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the determination of addition as set forth in paragraph (2). Thus, the judgment of the court of first instance is just in finding the facts of first instance and determining the evidence submitted by the plaintiff to this court in light of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court of first instance, and there is no error as alleged by the plaintiff in the grounds for appeal. The evidence of the judgment of the court of first instance 1 as set forth in subparagraph 2 of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, i.e., “A evidence No. 9” of subparagraph 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance 1 as “A evidence No. 11.”

Part 5 of the judgment of the first instance court No. 14 "A No. 9" shall be raised by "A No. 11".

Part 6 of the judgment of the first instance shall be added to the following 8 conduct:

The plaintiff issued a tax invoice on the rent of the temporary site supplied to F and G from October 2016 to February 2017 (No. 1 to No. 5). In addition, the plaintiff, at the time of returning the said temporary site, was drafted by C, G, and F (refer to the document prepared by the plaintiff on September 7, 2020). The plaintiff agreed to the purport that "the defendant directly manages and returns the temporary site of the construction site of this case and directly pays the price for the temporary site of this case" (see the document prepared by the plaintiff on September 7, 2020).

Although the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone is difficult to recognize it, and there is a lack of evidence to acknowledge it otherwise (H Co., Ltd., which is another company that supplied snow at the same construction site at the same time, entered into an agreement on direct payment of subcontract consideration with the Defendant and entered into an additional contract on the supply of goods.

The following shall be added to the judgment of the first instance court No. 13 and 14 on the 6th page of the judgment of the first instance, "No. 17 and 18."

“(and each of the above)”.

arrow