logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2014.12.12 2014누1934
하천편입토지손실보상청구
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The court's explanation concerning this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for addition or modification as follows. Thus, this is acceptable as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The 3rd and 11th and 12th of the judgment of the first instance shall be changed as follows:

7) Meanwhile, despite the completion of the transfer registration of ownership in G, H and I on the land before subdivision, the registration of ownership in the name of the Republic of Korea on June 5, 1981, the registration of ownership in the name of the defendant on June 21, 1983, and the registration of ownership transfer in the name of Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on January 15, 192 was completed. The two pages 7 shall be changed to P and R. 7, followed by the following "No. 7 and No. 8". Five pages 5, "No. 1, 5, 1965" was changed to "No. 1, 2, 197, 1, 2, 197, 1, 2, 2, 1, 3, 1, 197, 1, 1, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 1, 5, 1, 1, 1966."

arrow