beta
Text
1. Of the distribution schedule prepared by the said court on July 17, 2014 in the Suwon District Court’s Sung-nam Branch B real estate auction case.
Reasons
1. On June 10, 201, the registration of the establishment of a mortgage (390,000,000 won, C) in the name of the Defendant was owned as of September 14, 2010. ② On October 18, 2010, the registration of the establishment of a mortgage (300,000,000 won, C) in the name of the Plaintiff was forged by forging relevant documents. ② On January 27, 201, the registration of the establishment of a mortgage (247,00,000,000 won, D) in the name of the Defendant was registered (130,000,000,000 won, 4) in the name of the Defendant on July 8, 2011, the registration of the establishment of a mortgage (130,000,000,000 won, 3) in the name of the Plaintiff on September 16, 2011.
A. The registration relationship with regard to F-581 square meters in Gwangju-si and multi-household buildings (multi-household houses) constructed on the instant land, which are located on the instant land, in the instant land
B. On August 8, 2013, upon the Defendant’s application, the instant auction procedure was commenced regarding the instant housing on August 8, 2013. In the appraisal conducted during the auction procedure, the instant housing price was assessed as KRW 170,00,000 (the assessed value of the building portion was KRW 119,000,000, the assessed value of the site right was KRW 51,000,000, and the instant housing was sold at KRW 91,190,000. 2) The auction court prepared the instant auction schedule that, on July 17, 2014, the amount was distributed to the Defendant, who is the applicant creditor, of the total amount of KRW 88,762,669, excluding the pertinent tax amount of KRW 48,980, the assessed value was assessed as KRW 170,00,00.
On March 5, 2012, the Plaintiff, as a person holding a provisional attachment right or a person holding a provisional injunction, was entitled to the right to claim the cancellation of the right to claim the cancellation of the right to collateral security due to a tort, and was subject to a provisional injunction against the disposal of real estate in this case (this Court Decision 2012Kahap
The amount of distribution to the defendant present on the date of distribution.