1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On July 23, 2009, the Defendant entered into an insurance contract with the Plaintiff as the insured on its own (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”).

B. After the Defendant’s contract of this case was concluded, the Defendant asserted that the Plaintiff was hospitalized for 13 days from August 29, 201 to September 10, 201 as indicated in Table 1, including that he was hospitalized for 13 days due to an acute eroculation in which he had no blood transfusion or tent from the hospital B during the period from August 29, 201 to September 10, 201, and that the total number of 561 days from August 29, 201 to July 23, 2014 as listed in Table 1. However, in full view of the evidence evidence No. 1 of this case, the results of the fact-finding on the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Agency of this case, and the purport of the entire arguments, this appears

Receiving hospitalized treatment.

[표 1] 순번 병원명 진단 및 수술명 입원기간 일수 입원일 퇴원일 1 B병원 출혈 또는 천공이 없는 급성 위궤양 2011. 8. 29. 2011. 9. 10. 13 2 C병원 결장의 폴립, 급성췌장염 2011. 9. 24. 2011. 10. 7. 14 3 D병원 결장의 폴립, 급성췌장염 2011. 12. 7. 2011. 12. 19. 13 4 E병원 결장의 폴립, 급성췌장염 2012. 4. 12. 2012. 4. 30. 19 5 F병원 결장의 폴립, 급성췌장염 2012. 5. 11. 2012. 5. 19. 9 6 G병원 결장의 폴립, 급성췌장염 2012. 6. 13. 2012. 6. 29. 17 7 H의원 결장의 폴립, 급성췌장염 2012. 7. 6. 2012. 7. 31. 26 8 I의원 허리뼈의 염좌 및 긴장, 아래 다리 부위에서의 종아리 근육군의 근육 및 힘줄의 손상 2012. 8. 8. 2012. 8. 22. 15 9 C병원 결장의 폴립, 급성췌장염 2012. 8. 25. 2012. 9. 8. 15 10 G병원 결장의 폴립, 급성췌장염 2012. 9. 11. 2012. 9. 20. 10 11 F병원 결장의 폴립, 급성췌장염 2012. 9. 21. 2012. 9. 25. 5 12 I의원 허리뼈의 염좌 및 긴장, 발목의 염좌 및 긴장 2012. 10. 10. 2012. 10. 24. 15 13 J병원 등뼈의 염좌 및 긴장, 허리뼈의 염좌 및 긴장 2012. 11. 29. 2012. 12. 15. 17 14 K병원 척추협착 2013. 1. 3. 2013. 1....